...by Daniel Szego
quote
"On a long enough timeline we will all become Satoshi Nakamoto.."
Daniel Szego
Showing posts with label network effect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label network effect. Show all posts

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Blockchain and network science


Blockchain and distributed ledger systems are pretty much natural targets of network science. They are based on networks regarding both the infrastructure and the transaction graph networks. On top most current network are public, meaning there is a really huge number of data available for analysis. Network science investigations could be carried out on two or three level. 

1. On the infrastructure side, analysis of the P2P topology combining with the changing of the topology and consensus mechanism that can be analyzed. Some consensus mechanisms like Ripple or from Stellar are very much dependent on the network structure. Other classical algorithms like proof of work are perhaps less sensible, however certain network structures make different attacks vectors easier, whilst others guarantee almost the theoretical limits of Byzanzine fault tolerance. 

2. On the transaction side, the dynamics of the different transactions which is important. This is theoretically similar to the cash-flow of the classical systems, the difference is here however that the dynamics of the transaction flow is much faster and all the information is public, implying a much broader investigation possibility. 

3. Last but not least, the blockchain can be analyzed with the help of different other systems. Examples might be the correlation of the blockchain or the transaction flow of two blockchains and perhaps the exchange rates of the two cryptocurrencies. Another option might be to analyze the connections between a blockchain solution and a traditionally centralized www system.  

Friday, April 13, 2018

Network effect and blockchain forks


Decentralized applications based on the blockchain are heavily dependent on the network effects. The value of each platform will be strongly depend on how many actors use the network. In this sense, public networks have much more chance to reach mainstream adaptation than the consortium ones. It is actually an interesting question which of the consortium blockhain solutions have the chance to reach mainstream adaptation: probably the ones that have public solutions as well. One thing that is however dangerous for public blockchains is the forking. Forking practically splits the community into two competing parts. However because of the network effect, such a split will not half the value of the individual networks but quarters them, with other words halfing the value of the whole network.